tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5842308776616107900.post8157759556922026260..comments2023-06-29T23:58:03.749+10:00Comments on church of nobody: A Dear John Letternobodyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13067422372087431256noreply@blogger.comBlogger50125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5842308776616107900.post-52825693084476413362011-10-14T10:26:43.573+11:002011-10-14T10:26:43.573+11:00http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ot028a1CQ48&NR=...http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ot028a1CQ48&NR=1<br /><br />go to the 33rd second and watch the handshake and the forefinger. 33 seconds must coincedence right.....<br /><br />question, what is your prime (definitive) piece of evidence to disprove the no planes theory. i've seen nothing to definitively disprove it, so remain not fully closed to the idea.rupertnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5842308776616107900.post-67447594692250539682011-10-04T06:20:37.820+11:002011-10-04T06:20:37.820+11:00from august 5th:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G_...from august 5th:<br />http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G_5B9zw3-oo<br />woman speaking of her husband gunther who was arrested 2 days after <br />they married, his jailers releasing and reincarcerating him a number of <br />cycles. This lady claims Lybia* in the fifties was the pedophile capital of <br />the world.<br />Idris ruled over that and ran away to england when Ghaddafi threw him <br />out.<br />* - 78 vs 62 miljan hits for libya vs lybia (german spelling is lybien)<br />good enough reason for some to go to war over i expect<br /><br />talkstreamlive -- poorrichards - ralen's radio rmn ???<br />rayedio.com ... ok<br />http://radio.rumormillnews.com/podcast/page/2/<br />and yet the station hasn't reported on lybia for nearly a month???? <br />put on la(te)st nobby thread?<br /><br /> Rayelan : Message: HUGE LIBYAN WATER PROJECT TO MAKE LYBYA SELF <br /> groups.yahoo.com/group/Rayelan/message/1755<br /> 2 posts - 1 author - Last post: 7 Mar<br /> Libya - Faction Two - The Monarchy - NWO Pedophile Trade - Ancient <br /> ... http://www.rayedio.com/podcast. <br /> http://www.templarprosperity.com ...<br /><br /> BUTLINCAT'S BLOG: LESBIAN CORRUPTION<br /> butlincat.blogspot.com/2011/03/lesbian-corruption.html<br /> . UK DENIIES USING DU WEAPONS IN LIBYA - <br /> http://media.blubrry.com/rayedio/p/rayedio.com/podcast/samples/2011/20110309-mcconnellhawkins0.mp3 <br /> You are here : Adamite.com » butlincat, Latest Articles » <br /> Lesbian Cult, Pedophile Oaths, And Guilds<br /> Posted On Thursday, 10 Mar 2011. Under: butlincat, Latest Articles.<br /> http://www.adamite.com/?p=1467<br /><br />Rayelan has twice the listenership of Glenn Beck? who wouldathunk<br />http://chatroom.themicroeffect.com/<br />http://www.talkstreamlive.com/talk_radio/radiormn.stream<br />libya last tagged 13th of julypiety piethttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08830513824592023744noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5842308776616107900.post-26351149179602320012011-09-29T22:55:47.197+10:002011-09-29T22:55:47.197+10:00Satanic Voices, Ancient and Modern by David Musa P...Satanic Voices, Ancient and Modern by David Musa Pidcock - most interesting.<br /><br />- AangirfanAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5842308776616107900.post-21790093981794704072011-09-27T04:21:56.212+10:002011-09-27T04:21:56.212+10:00I certainly agree with you about Mr Friend and his...I certainly agree with you about Mr Friend and his continual harping on the no planes nonsense. Did he mention no planes? He doesn't mean to distract the discussion but did he mention no planes on 9/11. Not to distract from the more important issues but did he he tell you there were no ....A. J. MacDonald, Jrhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02606590381956913426noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5842308776616107900.post-23429683579353532852011-09-25T16:47:14.435+10:002011-09-25T16:47:14.435+10:00Frankly, I see NO need for any writer's remors...Frankly, I see NO need for any writer's remorse. No planes? Jim Fetzer? Gordon Duff? etc. I always assumed the kid was just a dizzard -- but cointelpro MAY BE right.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5842308776616107900.post-64469062334078537102011-09-23T08:15:46.919+10:002011-09-23T08:15:46.919+10:00Very good.
This piece received a lot of criticism...Very good.<br /><br />This piece received a lot of criticism, more than any other I think. And it was well deserved.<br /><br />In thinking about it, where I went wrong was in the writing. The entire initial angle, ie. the foundation on which everything was then laid, was wrong. Subsequently everything that followed was doomed. And it's obvious really - repetition > the absurd length > lack of clarity > and the desperate attempts to fix it by way of more of the same. It was just a disaster.<br /><br />My flipping out and asking all and sundry if I should delete it was actually based on my embarassment at having such a piece of poorly written shit sitting on my blog for all of posterity (if you know what I mean). And frankly such embarassment is no one's kettle of fish but mine.<br /><br />So I'll leave the damn thing here (albeit renamed with the original title) and cringe every time I see it score a hit in statcounter. Suitable punishment.<br /><br />Otherwise I'll address all this in the next piece. Or to put it another way, not address it at all, if that makes sense. Anyway, later.nobodyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13067422372087431256noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5842308776616107900.post-79679166098697332842011-09-23T07:16:54.097+10:002011-09-23T07:16:54.097+10:00Dear Nobody,
I can see (and understand, to some ex...Dear Nobody,<br />I can see (and understand, to some extent) that you are bat-shit tired of talking about no you-know-whats on you-know-when. However, I continue to strongly disagree with almost all of your argumentation for it, you writing it off, and your assumptions on it. In the end, of course it isn't the end of the world as long as we are all on the same page on 9/11 and the building demos and whatnot. But to write it off as disinfo just because it is a divisive subject . . . is very wrong, IMHO. No such assumptions are made, for instance, about believing in the moon landings (seeing is believing) or not as being the key to determining whether any of us are disinfo agents or not. Hey, we are all searching for truth out there, and we are all surrounded by shit (cointelpro stuff) that represents every side to every theory on what went down. There are a hundred different techniques to divide and conquer, and as we have seen with many a limited hangout agent, they all have an angle. Like playing poker with pros, it's never about just pretending to have the opposite of what you have . . . you have to style your disinformation to the receiver.<br /> <br />I did have a good laugh at your drunk guy getting kicked out of a bar analogy, though. How could you know (I may or may not have mentioned it ever here) that I was a bartender and basically the bouncer as well when needed for quite a few years, and have seen that situation a hundred times? And you know, it wasn't a bad analogy . . . because at the end of the day, people are most definitely NOT propelled only by singular, easy to pin down desires. Sometimes, a guy would really like the bar, the atmosphere, the people. Sometimes, he'd be just stubborn. Sometimes, it was wounded pride that brought him back. Othertimes, there was a hot girl who went there that he really wanted to see. Many other times, who the fuck knows. And sometimes they had a screw loose. And life is like that, and just like bars, I find that many blogs are like that to some limited extent.<br /> <br />Have I noticed the no-planes thing getting ramped up lately? Not really. Have I noticed the "men never went to the moon" thing getting ramped up lately? Yes. Sometimes disinfo has to ramp up alongside public questioning of things, so as to steer it later. Other times, disinfo invents "issues" wholesale. It's often tough to judge, but in examining a subject more closely to determine what is happening . . . is rarely a waste of time.<br /> <br />BTW, never quoted Gallier, only explained that a previous comment discussion with/against him had propelled me to re-examine things.<br /> <br />But as you wish, I will just leave it be for now.<br /><br />ps - Why erase it? Not sure of your reasoning.slozonoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5842308776616107900.post-61253020782334872682011-09-23T05:47:20.610+10:002011-09-23T05:47:20.610+10:00ummmm..
patrick's latest of les's latest
...ummmm..<br /><br />patrick's latest of les's latest<br /><br />http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fkp95ePFy5Y<br /><br />orig post<br /><br />http://zippittydodah.blogspot.com/2011/09/world-declaration-of-liberation-from.html<br /><br /><br />just hadta share :)<br />whatta vibe. :)kikzhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05647064395400783134noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5842308776616107900.post-79445018836303826082011-09-23T00:28:07.163+10:002011-09-23T00:28:07.163+10:00Leave it up!Leave it up!The Realist Reporthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17331636747072636125noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5842308776616107900.post-27859531857625493342011-09-23T00:16:53.040+10:002011-09-23T00:16:53.040+10:00IMO don't remove it. If JF is a cointelpro you...IMO don't remove it. If JF is a cointelpro you've exposed him. If his genuine, you've showed his mono-maniacal obsession and lack of meta-reflection (seeing the big picture) i.e. not interesting.gallier2https://www.blogger.com/profile/04285836062429366578noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5842308776616107900.post-45790251464429579332011-09-22T23:26:31.071+10:002011-09-22T23:26:31.071+10:00my personal 2... wait... there's no 'cents...my personal 2... wait... there's no 'cents' key on my board.. nevermind...<br /><br />planes... no planes... immaterial.<br />'airborne craft(s)' cover that.<br /><br />what interests me more; holes put into NORAD response protocols by cheney/rummy/neocon cast of 100's including all 'dual' foreign nationals. especially dov zakheim who was comptroller over the pentagon, and that 2.3 trillion that poofed leads us to 'the money trail'. cui bono? where did it go? black ops? the AG budget.. they hide stuff there all the time......who did/allowed this to happen? follow the money and follow the promotions, follow the trades (shorting the airlines) made b4 9/11. . find the bastards and persecute for treason.<br /><br />lastly undo the dreadful patriot act and all associated; new DHS BS, TSA groping and all legislation passed that has hobbled our freedoms and overridden our Constitution and turned what was left of this country into a police state.<br /><br />DEW's.. possibility exists; and whoelse would have it? of course the mil........and it also feeds into the 'nazi helping' space aliens push frm the MSM, that's been absolutely 'mainlined' of late.<br />why? added fear factor for possible blue beam holographic OP. shrugz....?<br /><br />sorry i'm w/sagan on this.. ET'll just hafta land in yard and call me out to tea for me to confirm that one.<br /><br />yeah, there's life out there.. but to borrow sentiment frm douglas adams; i think we're under galactic quarantine for general stupidity. somewhere a beacon is beaming out a warning signal... idiots at play...........avoid contact. :)<br /><br />so many other windmills to charge...<br />noby... so many warrens occupied w/snakes we can name and find and drag out into the light and behead. <br />personally i think your strong mind would be better utilized in those pursuits.kikzhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05647064395400783134noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5842308776616107900.post-38597506846988901202011-09-22T21:55:08.740+10:002011-09-22T21:55:08.740+10:00Keep it up Nobody.
Whether you were right on this...Keep it up Nobody.<br /><br />Whether you were right on this or wrong (I suspect probably wrong), you have made some sharp observations along the way.Edohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04382069174934294077noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5842308776616107900.post-59367005372621645022011-09-22T21:26:58.324+10:002011-09-22T21:26:58.324+10:00Actually, in bowing before the wisdom of the sage ...Actually, in bowing before the wisdom of the sage P2P I asked if I wouldn't be better off just deleting the whole thing. She said it was where my head was at at the time and besides which others had contributed things to the comments. But where my head was at is nothing too special and the comments in question aren't mine, they belong to others.<br /><br />So I throw it open. Will I delete this entire entry? Or leave it here? No need for non-regulars to express an opinion and anons will be ignored.<br /><br />Folks what do you say?nobodyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13067422372087431256noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5842308776616107900.post-78079713674283981872011-09-22T21:16:13.964+10:002011-09-22T21:16:13.964+10:00Beulahman, you're absolutely right.
John, her...Beulahman, you're absolutely right.<br /><br />John, here's what I'm going to do. This is prompted by the ever spooky P2P, who in the kindest fashion possible make me wonder at the point of all this. I won't delete this post but I'm going to edit the header so that it's won't feature as heavily in google results.<br /><br />And then that's it, I quit this discussion. And one's like it. It's worthless and reflects as poorly on me as anyone. I still think no planes are bullshit and that anyone who thinks that that's the key to anything (and who aren't spooks) want to wonder at themselves. They ain't doing anyone any favours.<br /><br />You can pile back in here if you like, do whatever, I'm ignoring it.<br /><br />Meanwhile I'll be writing something new to push this shit down the page and off it soon enough.<br /><br />ciao regazzinobodyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13067422372087431256noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5842308776616107900.post-70008142799414193592011-09-22T21:00:29.437+10:002011-09-22T21:00:29.437+10:00I don't "know" either of you, but fr...I don't "know" either of you, but from what I just read in this post, I would say that the anonymous commenter that wrote:<br /><br /><i>nobody, for a guy who "doesn't care what people think" you sure do tell us how you "don't care what people think" of you a lot.<br /><br />And for saying John Friend doesn't deserve another word from you, you sure did just write quite a few towards him. Make up your fucking mind you assclown.</i><br /><br />Is spot on.<br /><br />For someone so hellbent on saving the rest of us from the cointelpro spooks like John (ahem), you sure do know how to put down lots and lots of words that simply bored me to tears and certainly didn't convince me that he is a spook (and makes me even more suspicious of you).<br /><br />And John said you were a writer. If anything, I question his judgement on that issue.<br /><br />Don't worry about checking the stat counter. This will be my only visit.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5842308776616107900.post-80633030544700682822011-09-22T18:12:52.544+10:002011-09-22T18:12:52.544+10:00Slozo --
I think ROOTS OF HEAVEN is still around...Slozo -- <br /><br />I think ROOTS OF HEAVEN is still around, best bet might be yard sales or some such. I know I had a copy years upon years ago in the Navy, and it wasn't new then.<br /><br />I seriously did want nobody's take on the DVD, no diss was intended. Because the movie was a bust it was never OFFICIALLY put on DVD here in the states, thus the copy I have is actually a region-free, totally legal bootleg. Curiosity got the better of me and I got it from a local guy.<br /><br />And it is, as I say, good intro to the Gary novel. Romaine Gary was a Jewish writer who killed himself but put much of the truth as he knew it in the book. Also had a hand in the screenplay, his being a pal of Orson Welles probably got that part sold, eh?<br /><br />By this time probably way, way off topic, offer holds regardless. Because ROOTS OF HEAVEN is about saving elephants but... after you catch the joke, not really. The ROOTS OF HEAVEN at this point is a world-wide cult of people who know it opens the door just a bit, but the right bit.Franzhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16456268028429888846noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5842308776616107900.post-87592737134064690262011-09-22T17:15:09.961+10:002011-09-22T17:15:09.961+10:00Many thanks for the invite.
- AangirfanMany thanks for the invite.<br /><br />- AangirfanAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5842308776616107900.post-61053603435030625782011-09-22T16:23:26.349+10:002011-09-22T16:23:26.349+10:00I'm not sure if you're aware, but I do act...I'm not sure if you're aware, but I do actually talk to a lot of people about 9/11, in my personal life, professional life (when I can, of course), and through the San Diegans for 9/11 Truth Group that we have here. And no, I don't bring up the planes. I keep it basic, extremely basic. <br /><br />nobody, the last adjective that describes me is incurious. I've always been skeptical about things, and when I figured out 9/11, I was fucking floored man. Well, I guess I haven't "figured it out" (no one has, which is why we should keep talking and learning about it), but I do know that it is a major lie that has completely destroyed any credibility the government that rules the land where I live has over me. It was the event in my lifetime that has completely shaped who I am as a person, and what I stand for in this short period of time I have here on this earth. At least for now. Who knows what these fucks have up their sleeve.<br /><br />Since I've been awake to 9/11 Truth (fall '09), I've learned a lot about the world, history and the global power structure. It's basically the exact opposite of what I had just learned in university (graduated Dec. '08). Fuck me, how much do I owe those assholes for teaching me a bunch of bullshit, when I could have learned the real truth on the internet long ago? <br /><br />When I decided to start blogging, I wanted to be open and honest. That and the fact that I have zero creative abilities led me to use my real name to start blogging, John Friend. I write comments on blogs that I think are interesting. I say exactly what is on my mind, and I am honest about what I say. I want the world to know where I stand on the most important issues facing humanity. Plus, I want those assholes in Langley and Tel Aviv who are reading this to know that there are still real patriots, real men, out there that aren't afraid to tell the psychopaths to FUCK OFF. <br /><br />Finally, I really do think you're a phenomenal writer man. Just reading the comments here and the few articles I have actually read on your blog clearly show you're extremely witty, humorous, and sharp. I'm just telling you how I see it. That must be a new concept for you here on the internet? Or in life generally? You think I would suck up to you, or Timster, or anyone, by offering fake compliments? Sorry dude, that's not my style. Everything I wrote I meant. And still do. <br /><br />Anyways, you can take or leave what I just said here. I hope you at least heard me out. Peace bro.The Realist Reporthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17331636747072636125noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5842308776616107900.post-66993619484866757462011-09-22T16:22:41.132+10:002011-09-22T16:22:41.132+10:00First off, please feel free to comment on my reply...First off, please feel free to comment on my reply at my blog. If you don't want to, that's fine. If you do, I won't delete your comment. That is unless you start talking about my family and personal life, as others have tried to do. I encourage constructive criticism. <br /><br />You still didn't answer my question: what have I ever said that has been "hateful"?<br /><br />I'm going to put up a post in the near future (I'm busy as I'm sure you are) regarding my stance on the "no plane" issue, which is a complete misnomer to begin with. I hope you at least take a look. All I've ever said is that Boeing 757s/767s, which we're told hit the Pentagon, WTC 1 & 2, and crashed at Shanksville, were not involved on 9/11. At least, there is ZERO evidence for this claim. And if my past comments haven't been as clear as what I'm saying now, I apologize. <br /><br />I am not saying there were "no planes" on 9/11. I'm saying, specifically, that there is no evidence that any Boeing 757s/767s were involved anywhere on 9/11. I've repeatedly emphasized at kenny's and other places that I don't know what hit the WTC or anywhere on 9/11. Maybe it was a missile that hit the towers? Maybe a drone? Maybe a remote controlled airplane that Dov Zakheim's company made? I don't know. <br /><br />I'm also saying that there is pretty good evidence that many, if not all, of the videos in New York on 9/11 were faked, and that there is evidence that many of the victims, passengers, and hijackers were faked as well. 9/11 is a complete fraud, from start to finish, in every aspect you take a close look at. <br /><br />I think this is an important angle in figuring out the most monumental PSYOP/crime in human history, the crime that has ushered in the New World Order, or whatever you want to call it.<br /><br />http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3u3JSEqNtlg&feature=player_embedded<br /><br />Please listen to that. It's great, even if you don't like rap (which, generally speaking, I don't). <br /><br />I think it's an issue ("no planes") that should be rationally discussed and debated in the forums we're familiar with. Not many want to I've discovered. That's fine. But I'd like to. And I'm going to engage with those that have an open mind to this subject, and challenge those that rebut it. That's what you did nobody. And it was an extremely poor effort at that. I'm not trying to be a dick, I'm just saying. <br /><br />continued below.......The Realist Reporthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17331636747072636125noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5842308776616107900.post-14503769690560787642011-09-22T14:49:05.186+10:002011-09-22T14:49:05.186+10:00Otherwise, you need to stop lobbing me this piece,...Otherwise, you need to stop lobbing me this piece, that piece - an engine, a seismic record, whatever. This is a process that can go on forever. You've got to view it globally. Or holistically if you prefer. Which we can do from two angles. One is the question I already asked above. 'Why would you bother'. The other question would have to be, 'How come the no-planes case consists of an endless line bits and bits, and yet has no compelling reason for the why?'.<br /><br />And then there's the question I asked above. 'Even if this is true, what will it achieve that obviousness of the collapses and the evidence of thermite and molten steel couldn't do quicker and better?' And with less side effects, ie. having people think you're a loony?<br /><br />The more I think about it, the more convinced I am that no-planes wedge is the obvious, indeed the only possible strategy open to the government. They'd <i>have</i> to do it. They've got nothing else. Things are such now that there's more and better media disputing the government's case then there is for it.<br /><br />I think a shift is coming soon. Have you noticed that this no-plane thing is really getting amped up lately? Certainly there seems to be a lot of people flooding all the places I hang out. Hell, he we are choked with anons who have nothing to say apart from the fact that anyone who thinks that there were really planes is disinfo shill. What!? Where's the logic in that?<br /><br />Like I said above, there's nothing no-planes can bring to the 911 discussion that the thermite and collapses won't do quicker and better. Hell, they're already there on those. It's a done deal. Now all that has to happen is for enough people to see them and we're there.<br /><br />Unless of course we all grind to a halt and start again on a logic-free and evidenceless no-plane meme.<br /><br />Okay, I've just convinced myself. From here on in I'm not wasting another moment on no-planes. And you aside mate, I'll be viewing all no-planers as spooks (or useful idiots, ahem).<br /><br />Sorry if I hurt your feelings Slozo but you might want to ditch this one, if for no other reason than on account of who you're running with. Check these anonymous arseholes out. They ain't pretty are they? The government <i>has</i> to pile in on this. They've got no choice.nobodyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13067422372087431256noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5842308776616107900.post-21595598498814935562011-09-22T14:48:54.940+10:002011-09-22T14:48:54.940+10:00As for your no-planes argument, and your quoting o...As for your no-planes argument, and your quoting of Gallier, mate what are you doing? You're putting arrows in <i>my</i> quiver. I <i>did</i> keep an open mind. I repeatedly kept trooping off and checking no-planer's links. And like I said, I thought they were all crap. The guy who <i>didn't</i> keep an open mind (because he hasn't got one) is John Friend. Go tell him, mate.<br /><br />And finally, I didn't pick those two youtube movies because they were easy. They were merely the first cabs off the rank. I went to youtube typed in no-planes and they were at the top of the list. But like I said I've checked it all out before. I've seen all of them. This was probably my third or fourth time. I gave it a really good bash. And I never saw anything that impressed.<br /><br />Otherwise mate, the point of the exercise in my no-plane piece, and I was pretty explicit, was rather than bat down piece after piece of evidence with a seemingly long line stretching off to infinity, why don't we just get global? I mean, how much of this shit do I have to wade through? Or to put it another way: how much do I have to go through before I stop and ask, 'What the fuck is going on here?' Particularly when it seems any goddamn thing will do. I shot down two. First cabs off the rank.<br /><br />And if we're going to be global the obvious question is 'why'. Why would some use 'some other mysterious thing' when you've got perfectly good planes that will do the job just dandy.<br /><br />And the only responses I've had to that were all supposition and 'what-if'. Nuts! Is that it? That's all they've got? And that's worth splitting the 911 movement over, is it?<br /><br />Here's the obvious next sentence; <i>Well it is if you're</i> ................... Do you need me to tell you what group of people's name gets put on the dotted line there?<br /><br />-snip-nobodyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13067422372087431256noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5842308776616107900.post-31891980825244187542011-09-22T14:48:14.846+10:002011-09-22T14:48:14.846+10:00Sorry Slozo,
In yesterday's writing frenzy I ...Sorry Slozo,<br /><br />In yesterday's writing frenzy I didn't pay enough attention to the comments. First up I didn't misrepresent his anger thing. Sure he got angry, but after that he came back and acted like nothing happened. Unless I'm going mad?<br /><br />No, No, I just checked and that's how it went down and that's how I wrote about it. Imagine you were thrown out of a bar (or you stomped out, whatever) on account of getting into a screaming match, complete with explicit threats of violence. This bar, sure enough, isn't your local and you have no friends there. And nor is it the only bar in the street - there's a dozen within easy walking distance.<br /><br />Anyway ten minutes later you walk back in and act like nothing ever happened. That strikes me as odd. If there were no other bars, or if it was your local, or your friends were there - sure. But what sort of weirdo would walk back into a room full of not only strangers, but friends of the proprietor with whom you had the slanging match? And you then attempt to engage them in the same conversation that got you thrown out, like nothing had happened. Who would do that and why?<br /><br />Okay, okay, a drunk person sure. That'll teach me to use a bar analogy. But seriously if that happened in the real world brows would be furrowed, heads would be scratched, and the question would have to be asked, "What the fuck is this guy up to?" Because it wouldn't make any sense. And John's behaviour didn't either. And not as a first offence neither. By that stage I was convinced and this piece of weirdness was just the cherry on the cream.<br /><br />Also the point I was trying to make overall in the piece was that I was using statcounter as a tool to analyse behaviour which was senseless to begin with. Uh oh, perhaps I need another addendum wherein I include everything that had gone on at Kenny's? Nah. I'll spare us.<br /><br />The thing was, John had already had me scratching my head over his weird behaviour at Kenny's and then he comes here acting like we hadn't already given this a couple of go-rounds already. And does it all over again. <i>Then</i> I reach for statcounter and start putting two and two together. Sure enough the weird picture then got weirder. Had his trail through statcounter been normal there'd have been nothing to write. Prior to me checking statcounter I had suspicions sure but no 'lie direct'. After I checked statcounter, my suspicions were confirmed.<br /><br />And if you go back and look you'll see me break off mid-sentence. This was due to me realising that this was the fourth time I'd shot down the silly 'what if they missed argument'. And the thought went through my head, 'Does this guy read anything?' And I knew who he was already (what with the link), and I thought, 'why don't I go look'. And that was the end of that. Then I came back and was no longer interested in talking about no-planes. I wanted to talk about him. Because statcounter had shown him up as bullshit.<br /><br />And that was the moment. You can see it. It's right there.<br /><br />-snip-nobodyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13067422372087431256noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5842308776616107900.post-58583786346377990852011-09-22T12:58:41.288+10:002011-09-22T12:58:41.288+10:00Franz - is Roots of Heaven not available in paperb...Franz - is Roots of Heaven not available in paperback, here in the FREE WORLD of North America?<br /><br />You know, we have tough dudes in huge military installations and high tech skull stomping tanks fighting for our freedoms by eradicating the women and children of the brown-ish world.<br /><br />Should be able to pick a book up like that at the library, no?<br /><br /><br />I'm teasing, but I am curious about the book now with that story!slozonoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5842308776616107900.post-17437342240273127602011-09-22T12:46:23.040+10:002011-09-22T12:46:23.040+10:00Hmm.
I hear ya Nobody, I know you'll get back...Hmm.<br /><br />I hear ya Nobody, I know you'll get back to me. Inevitably, we'd just meet in disjointed dialogue in some forgotten comments section anyways, as usual. No worrie smate.<br /><br />But I did need to comment on the comments . . . it's spooky, isn't it? Makes me think you were righter than ever on the aforementioned victim of your vicious assails . . . in a way. Not from HIS comments, mind you - but more from other ones, if YOU can dig it (sorry to turn your fave phrase on you, but I do love it so myself by coincidence).<br /><br />Interesting stuff, and not entirely unintentionally hoped for from my "friend-to-friend calling you on something" dialogue. It was a half-assed thing (in retrospect, not giving myself much credit for it) that would certainly elicit certain responses from certain corners, and would certainly have gone a long way to confirming or not confirming things . . . and it has done that for me.<br /><br />Confirm things for me, that is. In a good way, that is, towards yourself being right on the spook.<br /><br />And also towards myself being right on no planes.<br /><br />If you dig. Through all my double talk (apologise in advance).<br /><br />Curiouser und curiouser, as they say.slozonoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5842308776616107900.post-54894053934946917292011-09-22T11:08:04.764+10:002011-09-22T11:08:04.764+10:00lol **grinning**
who said you were a wanker?
(he...lol **grinning**<br />who said you were a wanker?<br /> (he bop, indeed)Peterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08704099919721731322noreply@blogger.com