tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5842308776616107900.post5210774340265388034..comments2023-06-29T23:58:03.749+10:00Comments on church of nobody: A head full of Clint Eastwoodnobodyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13067422372087431256noreply@blogger.comBlogger41125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5842308776616107900.post-16959597352609891412010-07-20T15:51:21.816+10:002010-07-20T15:51:21.816+10:00That is good to know because m. Astera thinks Sitc...That is good to know because m. Astera thinks Sitchin"s 15 book form translations of the Babylonian clay tablets are bullshit too. Neither they nor Dave McGowan are bullshit. Now Sitchin is tribe but still the books are translations of real tablets from the Berlin Museum.<br /><br />I get a lot of that, he Zec is tribe as if because he translated them the tablets don't exist.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5842308776616107900.post-53376595181246658772010-07-10T11:49:42.396+10:002010-07-10T11:49:42.396+10:00Yay, three cheers for the grown ups. Good points t...Yay, three cheers for the grown ups. Good points there, Su's being the wildest.<br /><br />I heard similar things when I used to hang out at Xymphora. Allegedly he'd changed as well. I had no opinion on that matter what with only having read him after the supposed change. Xymph ludicrously ignored all and any aspects of the pedophocracy, was unintelligible on 911, and insisted that there was no way banking had anything to do with anything. Along the lines of <i>a different Xymph</i> the question is, did he write about those things before and then overnight quit? Somehow I doubt it.<br /><br />And I'd also be hard pressed pointing to any similar thing with Les. The god thing had always been there with Les but somewhere along the line it became <i>all</i> there was.<br /><br />Hmm... I was about to mention the first time I ever mentioned paedophilia as a possibility for blackmail (believe it or not, without ever having heard of organised paedophilia, and all that Dave McGowan stuff, I knew that there was an empty space in the discussion and I knew that only paedophilia could be what was occupying it. What a clever monkey I am!) anyway Les picked it up and put it in his next piece and I was about to quote that as a point in his favour. That is until I realised that my assumption then had been that (what with the discussion being about every member of Congress being beholden to Israel) that it must be Mossad that was running the show, ie. it was very limited.<br /><br />Such a postulation would have to come as something of a stumper for member of the SRA/mind-control crowd. It's an opportunity to point the finger at Israel but really the whole thing is fraught and best not to go there really. You know what I mean? For what it's worth, it got one (maybe two?) mentions at Les and was then never pursued further.<br /><br />Eventually someone piled in saying we should all go read McGowan (whoever you are, I thank you) with yours truly piling in con much gusto and with Les giving it short shrift.<br /><br />The other aspect of any replacement-of-author thing is that these are real people who presumably have friends and relatives (amongst which there must be at least one person who knows about their blog and is capable of informing the punters that whomever it is has disappeared or whatever). Hmm, thinks... I must give a friend of mine the password here so that he can pop in and inform everyone should anything happen to me. An unlikely prospect but whatever... <br /><br />As for the presto change-o thing - easier said than done.<br /><br />And people do change you know. For instance I was a fan of Diane Arbus, the photographer, and there was clearly a before-depression Arbus and an after-depression Arbus (who was no good, ahem). You know - shit happens. People change. Except for me! I shall never change. The nature of monkey is irrepressible!<br /><br />Otherwise, thanks John, thanks Slozo. I've got that link, but gee whiz, it's a biggie ain't it?nobodyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13067422372087431256noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5842308776616107900.post-82827105590335597512010-07-10T03:22:08.182+10:002010-07-10T03:22:08.182+10:00I did read that John, as I follow that website clo...I did read that John, as I follow that website closely.<br /><br />I think key to my point is that the truly questioning public, the people who want to fight for real freedom and true democracy (perhaps people like you or I) will attempt to be gathered up in one of the myriad of opposing groups. Family history, cultural trappings, and the media will all influence an individual to associate themselves with some sort of 'accepted' group that opposes the current regime. Then, the groups are set upon each other. Whether it's the "tea party" people, or Ron Paul "edit the fed" people, or the Noam Chomsky/Huffington Post reader "leftists", or the "less taxes for the middle class" people, etc etc etc - each of them have been set up by the PTB, or have already bee co-opted for their concerns, or is actively run by an agent for them.<br /><br />Never will there be an actual people's movement truly started by a real representative of the people who will work FOR the people . . . the PTB would never let that happen. Co-opt first, maybe replace, maybe subvert, change, poison the group with disinfo or propaganda, murder even . . . the past has taught us that they will stop at nothing.<br /><br />Remember, they have pretty close to absolute power, and they mean to keep it.<br /><br />btw - Les saying something like "don't follow me" is akin to a politician saying "I'm not running for president".slozonoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5842308776616107900.post-91623653469626962822010-07-09T20:16:50.870+10:002010-07-09T20:16:50.870+10:00That's interesting su. Now that you mention it...That's interesting su. Now that you mention it I also thought that M Astera's recent comments seemed different in some way, in tone and content.<br /><br />Les fits the profile for internet cult leader but he always said that he didn't want to be anybody's guru or for people to follow him. I think he also said something along the lines of "take what's useful and leave the rest". <br /><br />I don't know what to make of the recent business there and I don't read all the comments but it would be a useful place for certain people to get control of.<br /><br />Not trying to be off topic but in regards to slozos comment did anyone read Andrew G Marshalls recent piece at Global Research?<br /><a href="http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=19873" rel="nofollow">The Global Political Awakening and the NWO</a>johnhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00574763566985129420noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5842308776616107900.post-4436254477979360092010-07-09T12:24:54.589+10:002010-07-09T12:24:54.589+10:00That is an excellent, excellent, point Su.
Who kn...That is an excellent, excellent, point Su.<br /><br />Who knows? I find it unlikely myself, but certainly not out of the realm of possibility. Myself, I think he was always someone planted there, like many others, to gather followers who might question things. Turn the followers into thinking about inward things, self introspection, so-called "spiritualism" (ie - for the most part, letting your mind wander while high on something), thereby making you an ineffectual, useless, unmoving turd. The key is unmoving, that is, taking no action, verbal or physical, against the hundreds of assaults on us.<br /><br />That's why the peace movement was started out by the PTB, as detailed and hinted at by Dave McGowan - because, then you can be easily controlled.<br /><br />Fact is, we have always had the power . . . we just don't use it. Like cattle convinced to stay in a field by a fence any of us could easily break through, if we only knew we were strong enough and that it didn't really hurt that bad. And if one of us gets that idea in their head, there's a few cows to keep you in line and tell you what an idiot you are for thinking about it.<br /><br />Even the farmer with a shotgun in hand would run straight away from us if we all stampeded toward him.<br /><br />We have that power, and the PTB wants to make sure to convince you that we don't.slozonoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5842308776616107900.post-36152078422692226732010-07-09T01:11:08.807+10:002010-07-09T01:11:08.807+10:00i don't think les has been writing on his blog...i don't think les has been writing on his blog for a while now.<br />about 8 months i would say.<br />something different stepped in at that time.<br /><br /><br />m-astera and you have had issues but i don't believe that is him writing either.<br /><br />les had moments of huge ego stuff but generally he knew who he was - i recall him once saying he would not follow e. tolle into the desert. he was doing a butcher job on the writer/thinker - and in my comment i wrote that i would not follow les into the desert and he replied that neither would he expect me to.<br /><br />and the strangest thing is if les has had his sites taken over - how would we ever know?sunoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5842308776616107900.post-43268085505047056722010-07-08T15:14:30.622+10:002010-07-08T15:14:30.622+10:00Yeah, yeah, fuck the topic. And fuck the obvious h...Yeah, yeah, fuck the topic. And fuck the obvious hints. I give up here, I'll leave everyone to it. Have fun.<br /><br />I'm off to the haiku blog.<br /><br />Otherwise there'll be a new thing here eventually.nobodyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13067422372087431256noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5842308776616107900.post-53885705092631228952010-07-08T12:42:47.628+10:002010-07-08T12:42:47.628+10:00Hey Nobody,...I rest my case – ‘Schlomo the Sayani...Hey Nobody,...I rest my case – ‘Schlomo the Sayanim’ uses wikipedia as his source - tutt tutt. Har Meggido MEANS: 'HILL OF MEGIDDO' which is a geographical location in occupied Palestine - knucklehead! It is the prophesied site of ‘The’ culminative battle of good against evil. It is not open to conjecture! Annoy someone else; you are making me look belligerent (on purpose?).<br /><br />Nobbs...<br /><br />Peeg.veritas6464https://www.blogger.com/profile/05652634161424162750noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5842308776616107900.post-31989062595234376182010-07-08T11:59:21.404+10:002010-07-08T11:59:21.404+10:00ah well, i'll try again w/the post..
lemme se...ah well, i'll try again w/the post..<br /><br />lemme see if i can remb. frm this am..<br /><br />i'll reply using my daddy's fav adulterated paraphrased line...<br /><br />we'll speak of many things...<br />of coke & smoke<br />and cabbages and kings...<br />and if little piggies do hav wings...<br /><br />googoogajoob.kikzhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05647064395400783134noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5842308776616107900.post-20897344020056208222010-07-08T11:30:47.292+10:002010-07-08T11:30:47.292+10:00Boy, doesn't take much to piss you off, verita...Boy, doesn't take much to piss you off, veritas . . . just some simple, logical questions and discussion and you start spouting off at me. I did not expect that, I have to say!<br /><br />From wiki:<br />"Other scholars, including C. C. Torrey, Kline and Jordan argue that the word is derived from the Hebrew moed (מועד), meaning "assembly". Thus, "Armageddon" would mean "Mountain of Assembly," which Jordan says is "a reference to the assembly at Mount Sinai, and to its replacement, Mount Zion."[8]"<br /><br />You can look it up yourself, only took me one google.<br /><br />How is discussing what you were talking about "changing the topic" and how exactly is that being a troll? I would have thought you'd be happy to discuss you theories and thoughts on the world (your references to us being spiritual beings, your rejection of gravity as a scientific concept), and yet, at the very first examination or questioning, you claim I am being a troll, changing the subject, and being abusive!<br /><br />It sounds a lot like an Israeli.<br /><br />(sorry, couldn't resist)slozonoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5842308776616107900.post-79531916204228460092010-07-08T10:22:38.337+10:002010-07-08T10:22:38.337+10:00Hey Nobody,...Slozo,...Har Meggido, 'literally...Hey Nobody,...Slozo,...Har Meggido, 'literally' means Hill of Megiddo, the anglicized term Armageddon is exactly as it translates; the hill of Megiddo and as for "something that is not universally accepted, btw, if you look up the root of the word", where do you reference your SHYTE?<br />As for picking the peanuts out of my shit - why don't you go and swap spit with rub-a-dublin mick over at Les's, he's a fucking wanker too. Moot schmoot, I feel that your pompous approach to such pedantry is a cover-up for your intellectual inadequacies or a tactic to disrupt – perhaps that toss-pot DaveS was the one dragged into a pointless off-topic argument, he is normally not so offensive as tedious and cloying – you are both offensive and tedious. I rarely accuse anyone of being a troll because the term is over-used; however, you fit the criteria: You have managed to change the topic, annoy a lot of people and you are totally remorseless; infact you are playing the victim! Is is slozo or SCHLOMO?<br />FUCK OFF Schlomo!!<br />My apologies to everyone else, it is not fun to have to comment through all the technical errors and then put up with a lame fuck-wad like schlomo.<br /><br />Nobby...<br /><br />Not happy Jan!veritas6464https://www.blogger.com/profile/05652634161424162750noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5842308776616107900.post-21128239230543572462010-07-08T03:04:27.541+10:002010-07-08T03:04:27.541+10:00Actually, Veritas, you used the term spiritual, an...Actually, Veritas, you used the term spiritual, and I asked you about your point on spiritualism. Quote:<br /><br />"I believe (and yooo can believe anything you like) that we are spiritual beings"<br /><br />This was after you referenced the battle of Meggido as being the root of the word armageddon (something that is not universally accepted, btw, if you look up the root of the word).<br /><br />At any rate, not sure if I catch your meaning . . . but basically it's 'one's personal connection to the universe', and I take the universe to mean it not as a single astrological entity, but the endless amount of entities encompassed within our universe, that is, our sphere of being.<br /><br />However, I fail to see how your disbelief of the nature of how gravity works as explained by current science applies to your definition of spiritual - hence, my confusion over your explanation.<br /><br />And frankly, my "argument" (to go back to the exchange I had with DaveS) was not about semantics, and what's with the "get a grip" comment for me? If the comment is boring, ignore it . . . and the word is 'moot'.slozonoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5842308776616107900.post-68975546925584663382010-07-07T18:45:20.781+10:002010-07-07T18:45:20.781+10:00Hey Nobody,... What a fucking pain in the arse it ...Hey Nobody,... What a fucking pain in the arse it has been to comment - wow, I mean fuck me! I must have fucked around for two hours to get ONE up and then FUCK ME I see three! Please everyone excuse my vulgar expletives - If the zio-orks are messing with this Blog then, whatever, however if it is a corruption because Nobs changed the comment format and a virus was created by the corruption, maybe you should consider going back. I don't think Mr Smarm (Dave Smarm that is)is gonna come back soon.<br /><br />You probably don't remember my comment some months ago Nob about exactly the same issue I faced with comments crashing - I was hotly shit-canned by all and sundry for not allowing comments - it wasn't me - I went from un-approved to approved and whammo! It all turned to shit, go figure.<br /><br />Cheers,<br /><br />PG.<br /><br />Let's see if this publishes first go.veritas6464https://www.blogger.com/profile/05652634161424162750noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5842308776616107900.post-44333588953174694262010-07-07T16:56:14.960+10:002010-07-07T16:56:14.960+10:00You lost me, Su.You lost me, Su.nobodyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13067422372087431256noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5842308776616107900.post-29253920861017574462010-07-07T16:41:37.728+10:002010-07-07T16:41:37.728+10:00it is becoming more and more apparent to me that t...it is becoming more and more apparent to me that the greatest problem affecting most of us is over identification with our user names.sunoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5842308776616107900.post-42234004438151984932010-07-07T15:47:11.603+10:002010-07-07T15:47:11.603+10:00And I don't want anyone to think that I'm ...And I don't want anyone to think that I'm any kind of high-and-mighty about drugs. I ain't. I've taken plenty of drugs, coke included. People have bagged Les out for drugs before, but I never have. He talked about drugs and I was cool with that. But this is different. <br /><br />Here's a question - if a piece of artifice is driven entirely by drugs and yet utterly fails to mention that its chief protagonist is completely wired, all the while declaring itself to be real, real, real, and all with a relentless <i>you-must-live-your-life-thus</i> counterpoint, then what is that?<br /><br />I'm thinking it's like <i>Alice in Wonderland</i> but with the charm replaced by mean spiritedness and then that delivered as a fire and brimstone sermon ...kind of thing. I don't know man... I'm just shaking my head.<br /><br />Oh, and now that I think about it <i>Alice in Wonderland</i> is a fave of the mind-control crowd... sheesh, through the looking glass...nobodyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13067422372087431256noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5842308776616107900.post-62784093011984001002010-07-07T15:36:54.010+10:002010-07-07T15:36:54.010+10:00Back on the topic, I'm not too fussed about th...Back on the topic, I'm not too fussed about the precise definition of whatever it is Les is banging on about. Let's just put it this way: God/the gods have spoken to him and this time they're really pissed off and they're finally going to get off their arses and come down here and stomp people (literally). <br /><br />Whatever we call it, it's millenialist. All of what went before is ending and we should listen to Les as the messenger of God/the gods when he tells us to adopt his model of worship, or appreciation, or whatever hair splitting definition is required.<br /><br />And three cheers etc etc but can somebody sort me out on a minor question. Did I read right (over at the Smoking Mirrors comments) when Kikz wondered if Les had been on cocaine and Les said that he had? Is that right? Was that whole trip one long cocaine delirium? Certainly the entire following conversation then seemed to be about cocaine. Was this as a metaphor? Or (literally)?<br /><br />Because if all of that brouhaha was the result of too much coke, then... then... <i>what the fuck are we all doing there paying attention to it for?</i> God, it's like watching <i>Hurly Burly</i>, my idea of a hell movie. There is nothing more worthless than a drug-fucked conversation unless you are equally as drug-fucked.<br /><br />Speaking of hell, never mind all those classical descriptions of it, with the flames, the gnashing of teeth, and all that stuff. True hell is an eternity of sobriety spent with drug-fucked people endlessly telling you about things that are very important to them. Tell me I'm wrong.<br /><br />Further: what then are we to make of m_aster_vator piling in and stomping (literally) the phantasms that were assailing Les? Was he on coke too? Or was it just complete and utter bullshit?<br /><br />Fucking hell. Why are we taking any of it seriously? At all?nobodyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13067422372087431256noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5842308776616107900.post-9391636046686309402010-07-07T10:13:44.283+10:002010-07-07T10:13:44.283+10:00This comment has been removed by the author.veritas6464https://www.blogger.com/profile/05652634161424162750noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5842308776616107900.post-16321869290061980012010-07-07T10:06:10.694+10:002010-07-07T10:06:10.694+10:00This comment has been removed by the author.veritas6464https://www.blogger.com/profile/05652634161424162750noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5842308776616107900.post-8096025309412824302010-07-07T10:06:10.693+10:002010-07-07T10:06:10.693+10:00Hey Nobody,...Slozo, I didn't use the term ...Hey Nobody,...Slozo, I didn't use the term 'spiritualism'. However, FYI, I will explain as best I can; that which I mean about a personal relationship to the ineffable connexion 'I' believe we have to this electric universe. For example; I don't accept the theory of gravity, 'gravity' as a concept does not adequately explain Earth’s relationship to its moon or the centrifugal energy required to obtain a constant orbit. Also, gravity does not explain the ability to walk around on a planet travelling tens of thousands of kilometres an hour on a constant bend: Try and pour a cup of tea on a Roundabout.<br /><br />As with Egregious Will, the affectation of time and motion by thought process alone is an example of energetic influences beyond the scope of ‘mainstream science’ – a device controlled by the tribe for disinformation. Period.<br /><br />Déjà vu explains the quirk of a space time continuum that is ineffable yet presently experienced many times daily to many people everywhere.<br /><br />I don’t know the reality of the universe and everything etc. I do however, have a considered opinion and this has manifested as a belief system – “Do as you would be done by” and shoot monsters that lie, murder, molest, rob and cheat under the guise of being a ‘chosen’ tribe with carte blanche to lie, murder, molest, rob and cheat anyone anytime with no responsibility to the rest of earth’s community.<br /><br />I prefer to laugh and love; I have no problem shouting and fighting if I feel either me, my family or my community is being victimised! Investigate thoroughly first, then shoot without mercy later.<br /><br />We, as a universal community of ‘nice’ people are the Avatar.<br /><br />Free Palestine!<br /><br />Nobody...<br /><br />Nameste,<br /><br />The Midnight Rambler.veritas6464https://www.blogger.com/profile/05652634161424162750noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5842308776616107900.post-18454025278430355902010-07-07T09:58:09.828+10:002010-07-07T09:58:09.828+10:00This comment has been removed by the author.veritas6464https://www.blogger.com/profile/05652634161424162750noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5842308776616107900.post-47330489274741853302010-07-07T02:14:20.734+10:002010-07-07T02:14:20.734+10:00veritas - I would have thought by reading my comme...veritas - I would have thought by reading my comment and explanation that it was plain to see that I didn't want to get into a semantic argument over firearms. I only made the point to begin with that the explanation for people in the room besides to respond to a an un-silenced gunshot with indifference was ridiculous, and worthinvestigation.<br /><br />Unfotunately, I had a conversation with a troll, and it was my error to continue it as long as I did. That is the problem with earnest and open people like myself that don't mind defending their points and discussing things . . . it always looks like I am 'biting' on a troll like Dave S's. What can I do? My nature is to not stand by while someone espouses ridiculous points and puts words in my mouth, at least for the first volley.<br /><br />I blame Al Gore. :)<br /><br />As to your point about 'spiritualism, veritas - can you define it for me? Because for me, it's a 'guru' word, only meant to be entirely vague, so that it can fit into anyone's paradigm, thus meaning a hundred different things to everyone, and essentially losing all meaning.slozonoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5842308776616107900.post-44082575641641085312010-07-06T15:20:51.716+10:002010-07-06T15:20:51.716+10:00Hey PG, I read your comment mate. Er, I read it at...Hey PG, I read your comment mate. Er, I read it at gmail that is. Then I popped over here to see it on the page and it wasn't there. Nor was it at the blogger log-in page waiting for approval. What with me turning moderation back on (for those who don't know, this is due to a 'clabby/clixby' conflict in the comments of the preceding piece) um, where was I? Oh yeah what with that and assorted other comments weirdness, not to mention you posting it twice, I wondered if it had been disappeared by blogger or by you? Just comment yay or nay and I can cut and paste it back in for you.<br /><br />Is that cool? Yoroshiku.nobodyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13067422372087431256noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5842308776616107900.post-18249759058705172442010-07-06T11:43:59.390+10:002010-07-06T11:43:59.390+10:00This comment has been removed by the author.veritas6464https://www.blogger.com/profile/05652634161424162750noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5842308776616107900.post-16498130662004142262010-07-06T11:42:52.900+10:002010-07-06T11:42:52.900+10:00Hey Nobody,..Hhhmm,.."And there we find a per...Hey Nobody,..Hhhmm,.."And there we find a perpetual discussion of the Time of Revelation aka the armageddon, yes?"<br /><br />No.<br /><br />Revelation is an anglicized term - Apocalypse - those things that were hidden are revealed - hence revelation.<br /><br />Armageddon - Har Megiddo - hebrew - Valley of Megiddo. The term refers to the geographical location of the 'war to end all wars', not now or ever have they been the same thing.<br /><br />Why do many people think they are the same thing?<br /><br />"Oooh, oooh (hand waving in air frantically) “Pick me, pick me"...<br /><br />YES! Well, the almost complete control of everything by the tribe of monsters (lizards need not apply) that are always pretending to be that which they are not, have managed to twist the concept of their own violent end to appear to be some vague esoteric scriptural reference.<br />Not so, the battle that is prophesied to happen in the Valley of Megiddo will be a clash of nations based on secular ideals not differences of spiritual/religious interpretation. jews are not religious in the sense that say, catholics believe themselves to be, or hindus, or buddhists for that matter. The tribe is a secular cult that has for the purpose of social-engineering (micro-managing day to day conduct) a few books written for reference by essentially ‘make-it-up-as-you-go-along’ pharisaic rabbis as a means to an end; materialistic control and social domination. The evil monsters that are jews are not interested in a G-d or enlightenment or any of that sexy Les Visible mantra. They are pure and simple a gang of materialistic murdering thieving lying monsters!<br /><br />I believe (and yooo can believe anything you like) that we are spiritual beings. This is not a mystical ‘adopt the lotus position thing’; my experiences in combat, love relationships, hate relationships and as a bystander on the street-corner of life have manifested as a belief in ‘love light and peace’, why? HELLO! The alternative, that’s why.<br /><br />The tribe fears a weapon they use constantly: Egregious Will; they seed the MSM with horseshit biased in their favour because they need an existential energetic support for their existential victim status against their existential enemies – us, or anyone not devoted to thieving lying and murdering while they gorge their lust on all things we (normal folk; heh heh heh, sorry, I make me laugh) find abhorrent.<br /><br />We are dealing with mind-set manufactured psychopaths. By no fault of its own a child of the tribe is born into a nest of insidious vipers.<br /><br />As for Les’s Blogs and his tangential monologues of late – big deal, he’s a Showman, he’s a performer and he’s selling a product he may or may not from time to time believe-in. He needs a crowd and the friendlier the crowd the better, not that he doesn’t mind a fight, if he’s sure he can win. Les is one of us; no better no worse, just a slob like one of us. That he is gifted as a writer is obvious, we can take it or leave it.<br /><br />Oh, DaveS and Slozo; the resonance and percussion created by a weapon depends on the ballistics of the weapon; things like; calibre, grain-loads, is it an automatic pistol or revolver? Revolvers make more ‘Bang’ noise, sliding-breech pistols make more mechanical noise – per se, if the device is silenced, you will hear the working-parts of a sliding-breech pistol as they are engaged in reloading, etc: So, without the additional data your semantic argument is mute and boring - get a grip.<br /><br />On a personal basis regarding Blogs, I like this blog because it is intimate and comforting, not that I agree with all that Nobby writes, so what, that’s him, he’s quirky and funny (to me) and I like him – the Blog ‘entity’ that I am familiar with that is.<br /><br />So, fuck it all; we know the bad guys by their stripe, we know the good guys by their stripe...Let’s all climb into a clock tower near our town halls and make a difference, HEH heh heh heh!<br /><br />Nameste Nobs,<br /><br />Billy Pilgrim.veritas6464https://www.blogger.com/profile/05652634161424162750noreply@blogger.com